Taking a harder look at harassment
- Nom page
- Taking a harder look at harassment
- URL
- https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/taking-harder-look-at-harassment/
- Date de publication
- 05-juin-19
- Mots-clés
- Hate Speech
- Verbatims affectifs
-
There are two key policies at play here: harassment and hate speech.
For hate speech, we look at whether the primary purpose of the video is to incite hatred toward or promote supremacism over a protected group; or whether it seeks to incite violence. To be clear, using racial, homophobic, or sexist epithets on their own would not necessarily violate either of these policies. For example, as noted above, lewd or offensive language is often used in songs and comedic routines. It's when the primary purpose of the video is hate or harassment. And when videos violate these policies, we remove them. - Thème général (contenu, image, etc.)
- Policy
- Recommandations et bonnes pratiques
- Respect community guidelines et don't have "egregious [behaviors] harm[ing] the broader community"
- Effets attendus de ces recommandations ou objectifs qu’elles permettent d’atteindre
- Avoir un environnement YouTube exempt de discours haineux
- Type d'utilisation de l'émotion (Prescription/autodéfinition)
- Prescription
- Thèmes
- Encadrer l'expression des émotions
- Catégorie
- Modérer les contenus haineux
- Images
- Null
- Cas/exemples/illustrations
- "In the case of Crowder’s channel, a thorough review over the weekend found that individually, the flagged videos did not violate our Community Guidelines. However, in the subsequent days, we saw the widespread harm to the YouTube community resulting from the ongoing pattern of egregious behavior, took a deeper look, and made the decision to suspend monetization. "
- Contraintes
- Null
- Interdictions
- Harmful and egregious behaviors
- Sanctions
- Démonétisation
Fait partie de Taking a harder look at harassment